Global Agenda Forums

FAQ • Login • Register

Patch Notes: October 8, 2010
Author	Message
DryEagle Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:26 am Posts: 808 Steam Gamer Name: DryEagle	Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010 jaradrabbit wrote: Ashimmu wrote: an easier solution would be to make ore not be tradable between agencies. that way it doesnt need to have unique names because you can't move it out anyway. Not a solution. One person can grab it and make the sacrifice of switching agencies. Then it isn't a trade. Believe me, I did the full impact analysis on this, there are too many loopholes if they don't tatoo it to the agency. when i said 'not tradable' i meant have it locked to agency so that it can't be removed. building stuff should take ore directly from agency inventory ie people shouldn't be able to move it out into personal inventories and whatnot. _________________
Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:57 am

Andur Beta Tester Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 7:35 pm Posts: 5836 Location: Spain	Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010 Remembering/noting down the exact amount of materials you have to remove from agency inventory before producing anything is a chore. The "minigame" when configuring shields is LOL too. You have 500 milliseconds to set shields or it won't work.
Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:21 am

Randmer Beta Tester Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:12 pm Posts: 1895 Location: Moscow, Russia Steam Gamer Name: Plukh	Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010 EpicBroccoli wrote: If you have more than 5 level 30's in a raid, it's usually a loss. Too true . _________________ A more fun Defense Raid proposal Replace Perfect Target with Reverse Fission Bomb
Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:30 am

dual Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:07 pm Posts: 6354 Steam Gamer Name: EpicBroccoli	Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010 By level 30's I mean 30~39, if I saw 5 level 30s exactly, I'd rage quit _________________
Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:20 pm

jaradrabbit Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 1837	Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010 Ashimmu wrote: when i said 'not tradable' i meant have it locked to agency so that it can't be removed. building stuff should take ore directly from agency inventory ie people shouldn't be able to move it out into personal inventories and whatnot. ...or instead of changing the way the entire system works, getting it to pull from Agency inventory, just tag it for single Agency use like I said in the first place. _________________ HiRezDuke wrote: I've forwarded this extremely important issue to every person on the team... A fix is being implemented quickly to eliminate this gruesome travesty of a nightmare.
Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:07 pm

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Patch Notes: October 8, 2010

Author

Message

DryEagle

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:26 am
Posts: 808
Steam Gamer Name: DryEagle

Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010

jaradrabbit wrote:

Ashimmu wrote:

an easier solution would be to make ore not be tradable between agencies. that way it doesnt need to have unique names because you can't move it out anyway.

Not a solution. One person can grab it and make the sacrifice of switching agencies. Then it isn't a trade. Believe me, I did the full impact analysis on this, there are too many loopholes if they don't tatoo it to the agency.

when i said 'not tradable' i meant have it locked to agency so that it can't be removed. building stuff should take ore directly from agency inventory ie people shouldn't be able to move it out into personal inventories and whatnot.

_________________

Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:57 am

Andur

Beta Tester

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 5836
Location: Spain

Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010

Remembering/noting down the exact amount of materials you have to remove from agency inventory before producing anything is a chore.

The "minigame" when configuring shields is LOL too. You have 500 milliseconds to set shields or it won't work.

Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:21 am

Randmer

Beta Tester

Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:12 pm
Posts: 1895
Location: Moscow, Russia
Steam Gamer Name: Plukh

Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010

EpicBroccoli wrote:

If you have more than 5 level 30's in a raid, it's usually a loss.

Too true

_________________
A more fun Defense Raid proposal
Replace Perfect Target with Reverse Fission Bomb

Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:30 am

dual

Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:07 pm
Posts: 6354
Steam Gamer Name: EpicBroccoli

Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010

By level 30's I mean 30~39, if I saw 5 level 30s exactly, I'd rage quit

_________________

Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:20 pm

jaradrabbit

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:35 am
Posts: 1837

Re: Patch Notes: October 8, 2010

Ashimmu wrote:

...or instead of changing the way the entire system works, getting it to pull from Agency inventory, just tag it for single Agency use like I said in the first place.

_________________

HiRezDuke wrote:

I've forwarded this extremely important issue to every person on the team... A fix is being implemented quickly to eliminate this gruesome travesty of a nightmare.

Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:07 pm